By Michael Walsh
While the CCSU Student Government Association has seen its fair share of headline-worthy news the last two semesters, perhaps none of it was more shocking than the seemingly abrupt resignation of President Matt Vekakis.
SGA’s recent laundry list of news is almost hard to believe: resignations of its president and vice president, questions of ethics, budget concerns, challenged constitution and by-law interpretations and portions of meetings that would not be paired with the word professional.
And while the questionable has absolutely been weighted with some good, the SGA’s loss of its president puts a major exclamation point on the 2010-11 student government year that in our newsroom has been known for its ups and down.
Sitting down with Vekakis last October, I would never have predicted his early departure. His eager desire to change SGA and CCSU for the better left an impact on me. Two semesters is far too little time for any one busy person or organization to make drastic changes to a student body, university or community. Still, Vekakis had ideas of SGA financial self-sustainability and was aware of the importance of Governor Dannel Malloy’s budget announcement. Because of this, I won’t question his unexplained personal reasons for deciding to step down. The student government seemed too important to this one individual to say goodbye for no reason and the senate is certainly a less motivated being without him.
SGA and this entire student body is now at a pivotal point and you should care. Elizabeth Braun, interim vice president for all of two weeks, might become president. The lines are unclear because of her interim status, but if the by-laws hold true, Braun should enter the seat of president Wednesday. Otherwise, a special election could happen. Either way, a very new president will be serving our student body for the remainder of this semester and it might impact the very important presidential race for next semester.
As usual, elections for next year’s SGA president will take place this spring. Students should take note as the student government rides out these final few months of service. Experience in the form of a new president and vice president will come into play when those who want to declare their run for president do so. The Recorder has already exhausted talk about how much money SGA handles (it’s nearly $700,000, in case you were still wondering), but it doesn’t make it any less important when electing a new leader. While it seems like a comfortable amount of money, it was proven last semester that it can disappear much quicker than you think. A strong, dependable leader is needed to oversee all these funds and the rest of SGA’s actions.
I’ve already urged students to take the time out of their Wednesday’s and attend a student government meeting if possible. It’s now even more important to show outsider interest in the group. Had these headlines been about a larger, more widely-known group, the news would be national. It’s not, but this is our level. It’s the students’ business. We are the checks and balances, no one else. I cannot stress enough the importance of paying attention to what happens within SGA in the next couple of weeks. CCSU’s two student-elected SGA leaders from last spring have now both resigned and internally selected leaders could be the ones to replace them.
No matter what happens, SGA is fortunately made up of mostly capable and energetic CCSU students looking to make a change at the campus or community level. Even though the last two semesters have been highlighted by questions of judgment, the student body is in good hands with the senate currently in place. They are goodwilled and for all I know, the majority of the senators aren’t there for the title or resume booster.
Bottom line: the resignation of Vekakis, who was always appreciative of The Recorder’s positive and negative coverage of the SGA, leaves a bigger hole in the student government than you might think. Heads up CCSU students, SGA 2011 is about to get interesting.
kgdalia • Feb 24, 2011 at 8:29 pm
I guess this is a lesson in voting. Vote for the person who deserves the Presidency, not the one who puts up the most posters. I still wear my "Vote Rodriguez/Wooten/Fernandez/Funaro" shirt proudly.
Bob Hunter • Feb 22, 2011 at 10:00 am
It's funny that the more things change, the more they stay the same. I was Student Government President from 1990-91, and at times felt like more of a baby-sitter than the elected leader of the student body. It take a willingness of the leadership to confer often, and remain steadfast in their perseverance to make their university a better place. We DID make a difference, and did so only through our willingness to work together and stay our chosen course (which was not always popular with the university, but well-justified and honorable).
By the same token, the members of the SGA have to take a serious look at their motivations for filling the seats of the body. If those reasons are selfish, the SGA will most certainly fail. If they remain focused on bettering the university, everyone ultimately wins.
My advice to future leaders of the SGA: SEE the big picture; remain steadfast in your collective conviction to improve the university; FOCUS, and let no one deter you from your path. It takes a force of will to persevere and overcome the obstacles that lie before any administration. Quitting serves no one.
CCSUstudent2012 • Feb 22, 2011 at 9:57 am
You say that Vekakis was a motivated student government president, but where was this person at any SGA event. Never once have i seen this elected official at any of his organizations events, not the pep rally, not any of the times SGA was at athletic events cheering on fellow Blue Devils. Why hasn't he replied to any of my emails (5 in total) that I sent to [email protected]? If he was so motivated why was his senate so motivated to try and impeach him (senators need to be aware that students listen when they talk amongst each other)? If Vekakis was so motivating, why was one of the most prominent senators, Senator McKeown (who was able to get SGA to vote in favor of a $100,000 project) , motivated to resign his seat because of the direction of the SGA under Vekakis's leadership? All I have to say is I'm glad I voted for Alex Rodriquez last Spring I feel that he should step in as Interim President. I feel he is most qualified (he was our student trustee on the board of trustees) and would be represent me as a student on this wonderful senate.
Student • Feb 22, 2011 at 9:08 pm
McKeown's GPA was below a 2.0 forcing him to resign anyways. Also, that $100,000 "project" was neglected by your ever so "motivated" McKeown. Every time senators questioned him about it (whether through curiosity or willingness to help out) McKeown had another excuse. Although Alex Rodriguez would be a very qualified SGA President, the loser of an election cannot just take the position when someone steps down.
Also, I believe that emails to [email protected] do not go directly to the president.
If you feel so strongly about your concerns, I encourage you to attend a meeting or contact any one of the senators through email – their contact information is posted (publicly) in the SGA Office.
Student • Feb 24, 2011 at 12:09 am
People in glass houses should not throw stones.
Brian McKeown • Feb 24, 2011 at 1:09 am
I love the hate fan mail. Now the previous "poster" of comment, who apparently shall remain "anonymous", is obviously a member of the Central Connecticut State University Student Government Association. I would first just like to point out that all minutes of the SGA are taken down by a secretary, along with most of them being recorded. Now, this "every time senators" blah blah blah is apparently someone lashing out, which senators of the SGA are much more "motivated" to do, then to do actual work for CCSU's student body, which can easily be proven by looking at the SGA's minutes, unlike, "through curiosity or willingness" to help out, of how many times senators asked McKeown about this. I'm also glad that the previous "poster" had no argument or concern to the editorial, or the "piece", just wanted to drum up more drama, instead of making or suggesting improvements, another key point that senators on the SGA like not to do, that is, instead of doing. Now this person must not like Brian McKeown, being me, but seems to like to talk about me, and I love that this "creditable" news paper is posting such comments. Recently the Hartford Courant took a stricter role in making sure to "approve" all posts on their website, which the Recorder has also done, but yet seems to lack the journalistic touch to be able to post appropriate comments. I recall, that in a recent recorder, a journal class writing to the recorder was saying just such a thing of sorts. I shall not tell a lie, my GPA did fall below a 2.0, due to reasons that there are no reasons, but yet it did not "force" my resignation. I was resigning, because of exactly this high school drama, the exact example of our previous "poster". I will not single out one member of senate, but instead treat them as a whole, as they should be. It is not the single failure of a president, of a senator with another excuse, or of a senator who seems to do nothing but take pictures, but the failure of the whole CCSU student body. The student body has failed in taking the responsibility of electing and nominating people to positions of power in our college, and then making sure of a check and balance system. The student body only cares when they do not get their club funding, and even that is a small percentage of the student body. The currant Student Government Association is a joke, it's a joke that senators themselves take a part of, a joke of faculty, and a joke of the student body. Which means, that we're all responsible for the faults, there should be no of pointing fingers, and that as a whole we should step up to try and do a better job. But I am done. Maybe I should send this to one of the "senators" through e-mail, so that I can also get another, no reply. Drum Beat.
If anyone would like to contact me about information on the Student Government Association, you can contact me directly through my email, [email protected]. If anyone has any questions concerning the "$100,000 project", please feel free to also ask questions while I'll do my homework to come up with more excuses for you, especially you the "poster" boy of the SGA.